© OpenStreetMap

Site intelligence

Official evidence for every site -Know the landBefore you commit.

Turn fragmented geographic evidence into clearer site decisions - before committing time and capital.

Loading live geographic preview…

Illustrative geographic view. Selected official datasets and geographic coverage only. Missing features do not indicate clearance. Källa: Naturvårdsverket (CC0). Riksintresse in this view is Naturvård and Friluftsliv only. Map: OpenFreeMap / OpenStreetMap.

Screen sitesSurface unknownsPlan the next investigation

The problem

Important risks and unknowns often surface too late.

Geographic evidence is scattered across portals, maps and reports. Teams often commit time and capital before constraints and unknowns are even visible.

  • 01

    Fragmented sources.

  • 02

    Late assembly.

  • 03

    Unknowns treated as silence.

How it works

Find. Understand. Decide.

Four steps from a geography to a clearer next investigation.

Illustrative workflow

LINDBYSEARCH AREAABC
  • Candidate Site

Fictional geography and illustrative layers - not official mapped sites.

Search a geography and generate Candidate Sites from official evidence - investigation targets, not build permits.

Illustrative search geography with candidate footprints.

Evidence intelligence

See what's known.
Surface what isn't.

Official evidence, identifiable sources and explicit unknowns - structured around the next decision.

Evidence coverage

9 of 11 evidence categories evaluated · 2 not evaluated · Candidate Site A

Selected evidence

Environmental protection

Evaluated

0.0% overlap of site envelope

Source

Publisher
Naturvårdsverket
Dataset
Naturvårdsregistret protected areas

When a category is evaluated, NOXHEIM ties it to an official publisher and dataset - not an anonymous score.

Compare

Different sites.
Different questions.

Compare the evidence, constraints and unknowns that shape the next investigation - before committing more time and capital.

Investigation comparison

Three Candidate Sites · order of investigation, not suitability

Site A

Investigate first

Site B

Investigate after Site A

Site C

Hold pending unknowns

What differs

Environmental history

Environmental history is the key issue.

Constraint
Environmental history - official potentially contaminated-site record within screening distance
Unknown
Residential proximity has not been evaluated

Flood / water

Flood / water evidence requires review.

Constraint
Flood / water overlap requires review
Unknown
Residential proximity has not been evaluated

Missing environmental history

Missing environmental history blocks meaningful further comparison.

Constraint
Coarse terrain slope requires review before layout work
Unknown
Environmental history has not been evaluated

Use cases

Built for better development decisions.

Starting with energy and storage, NOXHEIM brings geographic evidence, constraints and unknowns into earlier site decisions.

Current workflow

Energy & storage

Early geographic screening for energy and storage land - so constraints and unknowns are visible before deeper diligence.

The mature Site Intelligence workflow today.

Exploring with design partners

Not live product modules today - directions for the same evidence model, not shipped sector products.

  • 01

    Industrial development

    Earlier land assessment with the same evidence model.

  • 02

    Logistics

    Location screening before deeper site diligence.

  • 03

    Data centres

    Intended pre-feasibility path - not a live workflow yet.

  • 04

    Municipal development

    Earlier understanding of development land and alternatives.

Trust

Evidence you can trace.
Uncertainty you can see.

Decision support from official sources - not a black-box score. Missing coverage stays missing.

Screening supports early assessment - not engineering feasibility, available capacity, or a connection offer.

01Official sources
Evaluated evidence is connected to identifiable public publishers and datasets where available.
02Explicit unknowns
Missing or unevaluated information is surfaced rather than treated as clearance.
03Decision trace
Investigation priorities and next steps stay tied to the evidence that shaped them.

Integrated sources

Coverage varies

  • Naturvårdsverket

    Protected areas · Natura 2000 · NMD

  • SGU

    Ground / soil (Jordarter)

  • Trafikverket

    INSPIRE RoadLink

  • Energimarknadsinspektionen

    Local-network covering geography

  • MSB / MCF

    Flood mapping (BHF)

  • Länsstyrelserna / EBH

    Potentially contaminated sites

  • Copernicus

    DEM GLO-90 terrain

Examples of integrated official sources. Coverage varies by dataset and geography. Publisher identification is category-level where available - not a claim that every record carries a public document URL.

Book a demo

Make your next site decision with better evidence.

See how NOXHEIM brings geographic constraints, known evidence and unanswered questions into one early-stage workflow.

Early-stage decision support - not engineering feasibility, available capacity, or a connection offer.

We use this form only to follow up on your demo request.